<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Redhill Councillors - working for the residents of Redhill Surrey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk</link>
	<description>News and views from Redhill&#039;s Councillors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:37:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please give us your views on the future of Redhill town centre by Cllr Julian Ellacott</title>
		<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/please-give-us-your-views-on-the-future-of-redhill-town-centre/comment-page-1/#comment-21182</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Julian Ellacott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/?p=1935#comment-21182</guid>
		<description>David - I tend to agree - I am working through the parking report (http://www.reigate-banstead.gov.uk/Images/008-GD31110-GDF-03%20Redhill%20Stage%203_tcm9-46418.pdf) and the proposals to reduce parking are high risk, especially as SCC are now finally working on residents&#039; parking.  I will certainly pass on your comments to the others involved in the consultation process (note that this is exactly why we have consultation!)

Thanks for taking the time to comment in detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; I tend to agree &#8211; I am working through the parking report (<a href="http://www.reigate-banstead.gov.uk/Images/008-GD31110-GDF-03%20Redhill%20Stage%203_tcm9-46418.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.reigate-banstead.gov.uk/Images/008-GD31110-GDF-03%20Redhill%20Stage%203_tcm9-46418.pdf</a>) and the proposals to reduce parking are high risk, especially as SCC are now finally working on residents&#8217; parking.  I will certainly pass on your comments to the others involved in the consultation process (note that this is exactly why we have consultation!)</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment in detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please give us your views on the future of Redhill town centre by David Howells</title>
		<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/please-give-us-your-views-on-the-future-of-redhill-town-centre/comment-page-1/#comment-21132</link>
		<dc:creator>David Howells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/?p=1935#comment-21132</guid>
		<description>All, 

I am ashamed at the planning. Especially for the train station car park. 

There MUST BE MORE car parking. 
This is 2012 not 1950 People use cars as an accessary and as primary transport and not a privilege, you are not taking this into account. 

more car parking is needed in Redhill for 4 major reasons
A) Shopping
B) Commuters
C) Office use 
D) Ease the parking congestion for Local people


The concept of more shopping and better facilities is a good one, but you have not thought anything about the people and how they will travel and especially Cars.

A) If you want people to shop then you MUST provide a LOT of car parking. I am not going to carry my shopping on the bus there is NO room to carry all my things and the seats are small. and the bus driver will charge me more and bus does not go near my home and i have to carry shopping to the door. Why should I do this when I have a car. It takes all my shopping with no strain I can listen to my Music and not listen to the kids abuse for any one that is not with them, and finally the bus does not get me to my front door and home. 
If there is no car park then you are going to have dead shops as people cant get there to Park and go home safely and at their leisure.

B) People use Redhill as a commuter point London. Every train from 0600 towards London is full. The car park is full at 0630 on weekdays
Buses are not direct to and from peoples homes, ,No-one wants to walk home from the bus stop in the rain. 
Giving commuters more parking only makes Redhill a better place to come for commuting and more people will use the station.
Please put a MULTI STORY CAR PARK ON THE TRAIN STATION CAR PARK. 

C) Local offices are not little one off&#039;s they are multi national companies, AXA, RBS, Insurance companies... They hire nationally and expect people to get to Redhill. If you live any where off the main London to Brighton line then you are driving to Redhill. There is the M25 to bring you from anywhere in London/Surrey/Kent/Essex/Middlesex to bring all these people here but NO WHERE TO PARK..... Parking space at 0800 is like Gold Dust, and people in local offices use residential streets to park much to the annoyance of local people. (These are the people that vote for you, hint!) Put more parking in and the offices would be fuller as people can get her to work.

D) Local Residents &amp; I am one, have been asking for Residents only parking for 20 Years. (it means that you have not listened for 20 years!!!) and with More Shopping and More Office and More Cars do you honestly think that the calls for Residents parking are going to go away.? Seriously. The residents Vote for you or NOT... As you expand Redhill to be better you are going to get more cars this is going to put more pressure on local car parking and residential &quot;free&quot; car parking which is at a premium and you are going to take car parking places away. Residents want parking for themselves and not for any one else and they don&#039;t want pay for it.

I am ashamed of you, and quite frankly will not be voting for any one of you next time.

In all you have not thought through any Car Parking issues. there is no personal throughout of the way people move and travel in any of these plans. This is a expansion with out thought for the people that travel and use Redhill. 
It is about personal freedom and Busses and Trains DO NOT give you that only a car can.

The solution is  easy, put a MULTI STORY CAR PARK ON THE TRAIN STATION CAR PARK.  The car park is on a slope any faces offices and blank concrete bank. having 5 or 8 layers of car park would not impact / have little impact on residents and increase parking. It would relieve parking on the side street and get local people off your backs. (20 years of asking for residential parking !!!) and give new shoppers a place to park and then wander Redhill and then go back at there leisure. (Buses and Trains are not leisure they are stressful and do not fill the needs of the shopper with families and shopping.
The land is sloping digging down to a low level and multi-layers of parking would 
A) give shoppers a place to park, and shop at leisure with out having to worry about train and bus time tables.
B) commuters an extra places to park and provide more security.
C) give the office people a chance for those that drive to get here and park giving increased office use.
D) ease the parking congestion for Local people as less cars would park in residential side streets


Happy to chat and discuss 


Yours
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All, </p>
<p>I am ashamed at the planning. Especially for the train station car park. </p>
<p>There MUST BE MORE car parking.<br />
This is 2012 not 1950 People use cars as an accessary and as primary transport and not a privilege, you are not taking this into account. </p>
<p>more car parking is needed in Redhill for 4 major reasons<br />
A) Shopping<br />
B) Commuters<br />
C) Office use<br />
D) Ease the parking congestion for Local people</p>
<p>The concept of more shopping and better facilities is a good one, but you have not thought anything about the people and how they will travel and especially Cars.</p>
<p>A) If you want people to shop then you MUST provide a LOT of car parking. I am not going to carry my shopping on the bus there is NO room to carry all my things and the seats are small. and the bus driver will charge me more and bus does not go near my home and i have to carry shopping to the door. Why should I do this when I have a car. It takes all my shopping with no strain I can listen to my Music and not listen to the kids abuse for any one that is not with them, and finally the bus does not get me to my front door and home.<br />
If there is no car park then you are going to have dead shops as people cant get there to Park and go home safely and at their leisure.</p>
<p>B) People use Redhill as a commuter point London. Every train from 0600 towards London is full. The car park is full at 0630 on weekdays<br />
Buses are not direct to and from peoples homes, ,No-one wants to walk home from the bus stop in the rain.<br />
Giving commuters more parking only makes Redhill a better place to come for commuting and more people will use the station.<br />
Please put a MULTI STORY CAR PARK ON THE TRAIN STATION CAR PARK. </p>
<p>C) Local offices are not little one off&#8217;s they are multi national companies, AXA, RBS, Insurance companies&#8230; They hire nationally and expect people to get to Redhill. If you live any where off the main London to Brighton line then you are driving to Redhill. There is the M25 to bring you from anywhere in London/Surrey/Kent/Essex/Middlesex to bring all these people here but NO WHERE TO PARK&#8230;.. Parking space at 0800 is like Gold Dust, and people in local offices use residential streets to park much to the annoyance of local people. (These are the people that vote for you, hint!) Put more parking in and the offices would be fuller as people can get her to work.</p>
<p>D) Local Residents &amp; I am one, have been asking for Residents only parking for 20 Years. (it means that you have not listened for 20 years!!!) and with More Shopping and More Office and More Cars do you honestly think that the calls for Residents parking are going to go away.? Seriously. The residents Vote for you or NOT&#8230; As you expand Redhill to be better you are going to get more cars this is going to put more pressure on local car parking and residential &#8220;free&#8221; car parking which is at a premium and you are going to take car parking places away. Residents want parking for themselves and not for any one else and they don&#8217;t want pay for it.</p>
<p>I am ashamed of you, and quite frankly will not be voting for any one of you next time.</p>
<p>In all you have not thought through any Car Parking issues. there is no personal throughout of the way people move and travel in any of these plans. This is a expansion with out thought for the people that travel and use Redhill.<br />
It is about personal freedom and Busses and Trains DO NOT give you that only a car can.</p>
<p>The solution is  easy, put a MULTI STORY CAR PARK ON THE TRAIN STATION CAR PARK.  The car park is on a slope any faces offices and blank concrete bank. having 5 or 8 layers of car park would not impact / have little impact on residents and increase parking. It would relieve parking on the side street and get local people off your backs. (20 years of asking for residential parking !!!) and give new shoppers a place to park and then wander Redhill and then go back at there leisure. (Buses and Trains are not leisure they are stressful and do not fill the needs of the shopper with families and shopping.<br />
The land is sloping digging down to a low level and multi-layers of parking would<br />
A) give shoppers a place to park, and shop at leisure with out having to worry about train and bus time tables.<br />
B) commuters an extra places to park and provide more security.<br />
C) give the office people a chance for those that drive to get here and park giving increased office use.<br />
D) ease the parking congestion for Local people as less cars would park in residential side streets</p>
<p>Happy to chat and discuss </p>
<p>Yours<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please give us your views on the future of Redhill town centre by Cllr Julian Ellacott</title>
		<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/please-give-us-your-views-on-the-future-of-redhill-town-centre/comment-page-1/#comment-21103</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Julian Ellacott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/?p=1935#comment-21103</guid>
		<description>Thanks John - yes, it is a long document, which is frustrating, but it needs to be comprehensive otherwise we are at risk of inappropriate development in future.  The summaries from the exhibition are now available on the Council&#039;s website (link above), which enables you to look at them at greater leisure, and we hope soon to confirm some more opportunities to discuss the issue with planning officers.  I&#039;m also happy to pop around to discuss it.

I will pass your comments on, and personally speaking, I agree on the parking point which I think is of fundamental importance to the town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks John &#8211; yes, it is a long document, which is frustrating, but it needs to be comprehensive otherwise we are at risk of inappropriate development in future.  The summaries from the exhibition are now available on the Council&#8217;s website (link above), which enables you to look at them at greater leisure, and we hope soon to confirm some more opportunities to discuss the issue with planning officers.  I&#8217;m also happy to pop around to discuss it.</p>
<p>I will pass your comments on, and personally speaking, I agree on the parking point which I think is of fundamental importance to the town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Progress on new primary school for Redhill/Merstham (from Surrey Mirror) by Cllr Julian Ellacott</title>
		<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/progress-on-new-primary-school-for-redhillmerstham-from-surrey-mirror/comment-page-1/#comment-21102</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Julian Ellacott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/?p=1957#comment-21102</guid>
		<description>Alex - as noted in the article the work is still being done and no decision has been made.  When the work is complete it will need to be reported on and come forward for a decision.  I would share your disappointment if issues such as traffic and greenbelt are not address in the report, but until it is complete we shouldn&#039;t rush to judgement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex &#8211; as noted in the article the work is still being done and no decision has been made.  When the work is complete it will need to be reported on and come forward for a decision.  I would share your disappointment if issues such as traffic and greenbelt are not address in the report, but until it is complete we shouldn&#8217;t rush to judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please give us your views on the future of Redhill town centre by Cllr Julian Ellacott</title>
		<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/please-give-us-your-views-on-the-future-of-redhill-town-centre/comment-page-1/#comment-20821</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Julian Ellacott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/?p=1935#comment-20821</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ian - this has been considered and feasibility work has been done in the past, but has consistently shown that it would be difficult to make a park and ride work in Redhill.  I certainly agree that parking on roads is a major problem, so much so that there is currently a lot of spare capacity in the car parks.  

Thankfully the County Council are now looking at residents&#039; parking schemes for residential areas, which would get rid of the commuter/office parking in local streets.

Please do submit comments formally, especially as parking is one of the more important and contentious issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ian &#8211; this has been considered and feasibility work has been done in the past, but has consistently shown that it would be difficult to make a park and ride work in Redhill.  I certainly agree that parking on roads is a major problem, so much so that there is currently a lot of spare capacity in the car parks.  </p>
<p>Thankfully the County Council are now looking at residents&#8217; parking schemes for residential areas, which would get rid of the commuter/office parking in local streets.</p>
<p>Please do submit comments formally, especially as parking is one of the more important and contentious issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please give us your views on the future of Redhill town centre by J Loughton</title>
		<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/please-give-us-your-views-on-the-future-of-redhill-town-centre/comment-page-1/#comment-20796</link>
		<dc:creator>J Loughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/?p=1935#comment-20796</guid>
		<description>Went to the &#039;exhibition&#039; in the Harlequin but was dissapointed that there was no one to talk to!
Very complex plan and too much for me to absorb.

The present town center has always been one of my concerns:
a) It seems to be always full of dubious looking characters (both sexes) making a noise, smoking. littering etc and dangerous looking yapping dogs.  
b) No control over cyclists inspite of signage.  For the sake of pedestrians make cycleways and make sure support officers enforce the laws.
c) Litter always a problem - make sure adequate supply of bins.
d) Level of pavements to be maintained and not left to become uneven as they are at present.

Make sure any of the exisiting public car parking spaces that are developed are replaced probably by an even greater number to allow for all the extra people drawn in to the new development. 

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went to the &#8216;exhibition&#8217; in the Harlequin but was dissapointed that there was no one to talk to!<br />
Very complex plan and too much for me to absorb.</p>
<p>The present town center has always been one of my concerns:<br />
a) It seems to be always full of dubious looking characters (both sexes) making a noise, smoking. littering etc and dangerous looking yapping dogs.<br />
b) No control over cyclists inspite of signage.  For the sake of pedestrians make cycleways and make sure support officers enforce the laws.<br />
c) Litter always a problem &#8211; make sure adequate supply of bins.<br />
d) Level of pavements to be maintained and not left to become uneven as they are at present.</p>
<p>Make sure any of the exisiting public car parking spaces that are developed are replaced probably by an even greater number to allow for all the extra people drawn in to the new development. </p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Progress on new primary school for Redhill/Merstham (from Surrey Mirror) by Alex Goodey</title>
		<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/progress-on-new-primary-school-for-redhillmerstham-from-surrey-mirror/comment-page-1/#comment-20676</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Goodey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/?p=1957#comment-20676</guid>
		<description>Much work by whom?  The council is still failing to publish details of any of the sites it&#039;s &#039;investigated&#039;, how can residents be assured that taxpayers&#039; money is being invested wisely - particularly when the latest proposed plot is greenbelt land and could only exacerbate the already dreadful congestion at the Battlebridge junction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much work by whom?  The council is still failing to publish details of any of the sites it&#8217;s &#8216;investigated&#8217;, how can residents be assured that taxpayers&#8217; money is being invested wisely &#8211; particularly when the latest proposed plot is greenbelt land and could only exacerbate the already dreadful congestion at the Battlebridge junction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surrey Cabinet agrees to build new primary school in Redhill by Cllr Julian Ellacott</title>
		<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2010/04/new-local-primary-school-proposed-by-surrey-cabinet/comment-page-1/#comment-20541</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Julian Ellacott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/?p=476#comment-20541</guid>
		<description>Matt - good timing with the question - see the latest article, (http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/progress-on-new-primary-school-for-redhillmerstham-from-surrey-mirror/) which links to a Surrey Mirror piece from this week&#039;s paper.  SCC have yet to release details formally, but we will get hold of these and publish them as/when we can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8211; good timing with the question &#8211; see the latest article, (<a href="http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/progress-on-new-primary-school-for-redhillmerstham-from-surrey-mirror/" rel="nofollow">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/progress-on-new-primary-school-for-redhillmerstham-from-surrey-mirror/</a>) which links to a Surrey Mirror piece from this week&#8217;s paper.  SCC have yet to release details formally, but we will get hold of these and publish them as/when we can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surrey Cabinet agrees to build new primary school in Redhill by Matt Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2010/04/new-local-primary-school-proposed-by-surrey-cabinet/comment-page-1/#comment-20463</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/?p=476#comment-20463</guid>
		<description>Is there any more news on the new primary school?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any more news on the new primary school?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please give us your views on the future of Redhill town centre by Ian Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/2012/01/please-give-us-your-views-on-the-future-of-redhill-town-centre/comment-page-1/#comment-20411</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redhillcouncillors.co.uk/?p=1935#comment-20411</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t suppose there is any chance of a park and ride facility for the new Redhill. Parking in local streets is becoming a major problem and if we want to attract people to Redhill for shopping, work etc.. such a facility would not only help with parking but would enhance the lives of the people who live in Redhill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t suppose there is any chance of a park and ride facility for the new Redhill. Parking in local streets is becoming a major problem and if we want to attract people to Redhill for shopping, work etc.. such a facility would not only help with parking but would enhance the lives of the people who live in Redhill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

